HeliconNFT
  • HeliconNFT
  • Preface
  • Market background
    • Market background
    • Market of games
    • Lack of liquidity in the NFT markets
  • HeliconNFT
    • HeliconNFT Vision
    • Helicon Ecosystem
      • Agora
        • Master NFTs
        • Regular NFT
        • Helicon Marketplace
        • Yield Aggregator
        • Decentralised Governance
        • Helicon AOS (Game Add-on System)
      • Helicon Drachma Token (HDT)
        • Token distribution
        • Appreciation model
      • Helicon Play
        • Helicon Titan
        • Hgold token
        • Helicon Game Interface
        • SDK
        • Game Partners/Helicon GPs
  • Promotional Campaigns
    • NFT Drops
    • Mystery Box Events
  • Technical Architecture
    • Layered design
    • Anti-quantum
    • MSS/LMS solution
    • BLISS solution
    • Smart Contract
    • Ring Confidential Transaction (RingCT)
    • Zero-knowledge proof
    • Cross-chain
  • Helicon roadmap
  • Conclusion
  • Disclaimer
  • Reference
Powered by GitBook
On this page
  1. Technical Architecture

Anti-quantum

At present, in the blockchain system represented by Bitcoin, the SHA-256 hash algorithm and ECDSA elliptic curve cryptography provide the most basic security protection for the Bitcoin network.

The emergence of quantum computers threatens almost all cryptography, which, among other things, is the foundation for internet security. Quantum computing is also a huge threat to blockchain-based cryptocurrencies. In particular, the quantum algorithm, Shor for computing discrete logarithms, can break the ECDSA signature scheme used by Bitcoin.

The Helicon project aims to build a safe, efficient, powerful and reliable decentralized system. Among all the functions designed by Helicon, quantum resistance is one of the most important features. Anti-quantum cryptography, also known as post-quantum cryptography, can resist attacks from quantum computers. Helicon integrates two of the most popular anti-quantum signature schemes, BLISS [DDLL13] and MSS / LMS. BLISS is currently the most efficient anti-quantum signature scheme, with the smallest public key and the shortest signature size, while MSS / LMS is the most efficient based on hash signature schemes. The security assumption of MSS / LMS is very weak (thought security is very strong), its security only depends on the security of the underlying hash algorithm. Under this security assumption, MSS/LMS is probably secure. So far, cryptographers have conducted a relatively sufficient analysis and demonstration on the performance, efficiency, and security of the two schemes.

PreviousLayered designNextMSS/LMS solution

Last updated 3 years ago